tinyblob.com

geekery and photographs

Archive for the ‘Meatspace’


Lost 6 ep6 – Sundown

I knew going into this episode that it was a Sayid centric episode. Not something that really thrilled me, because although i think he’s an excellent character (played by a capable actor) – i also feel that his story ended at the end of the previous series. But this was an excellent episode.

The beginning of the episode plays with us a little. We see Sayid nervously approaching a house, we see Nadia answer the door, we think about The Substitute, Locke going home to his loving wife. But no, Sayid isn’t visiting his wife, or his fiancee, or his girlfriend. He’s visiting his brother and Nadia – husband and wife. It’s not even his brothers emergence that causes this realisation, it’s their children calling Sayid “Uncle”. They’ve been together long enough to have two kids, and clearly Sayid still has feelings for her. Painful.

At this moment I was wondering why Sayid was in Australia, and still feeling like he was possibly a hitman. We joked at the time that he and his brother might both be hitmen given the shady almost cruel vibes that his brother gives off (and the “dry-cleaning” mention, cleaning is a sinister profession). But i think we have a clear picture of Sayid’s brother from the childhood chicken killing scene from some time ago. The rest of this episode makes it clear that Sayid and his brother are two different kinds of men.

The most important part of this episode, in my opinion, is Dogan talking about the scale. This is fascinating. He’s suggesting that every person sits somewhere on this scale between good and evil. Now obviously everyone is inclined towards some kind of moral behaviour (just as everyone is either slightly more optimistic, or slightly more pessimistic), but the idea that there’s some kind of discernible, definitive way of measuring this (with a red hot piece of metal, electric shocks and some dust, no less) boggles the mind. It makes me think of alignments in Dungeons and Dragons. I think it’s key to understanding a lot of the mysteries in Lost.

We have two powerful men in this storyline, Jacob and the Man In Black. We’ve seen them portrayed as light and dark, and we’ve had the MIB referred to as pure evil. We’ve also seen both of them manipulate people. We now know that there’s some kind of alignment scale that is pivotal, and we know that Jacob has been manipulating people’s lives for his own purpose.

I’ve spoken previously about the Night Watch tetralogy by Sergei Lukyanenko. To quote wikipedia:

“The story revolves around a confrontation between two opposing supernatural groups (known as “Others”): the Night Watch, an organisation dedicated to policing the actions of the Dark Others—and the Day Watch, which polices the actions of the Light Others.”

In these stories a “truce” exists between the two factions, keeping balance. If one side acts outside the truce (i.e uses their powers for their own purposes) they effectively give permission to the other side to commit an act with the same kind of magnitude. An early example in the stories is one character influencing a drug dealer to give up his “dark” ways. If caught, he risks allowing the other side to influence someone to find their dark path.

When humans become “others”, the two factions aren’t allowed to directly recruit them, they must find their own path, but a situation that arises in the story is the notion that one side can influence a person subtly, by changing other things.

This notion doesn’t seem too dissimilar to occurrences in Lost. The Man In Black finds a loophole to kill Jacob. He influences another character, and causes that character to murder Jacob. It’s made entirely clear to us during the scene that Ben is killing Jacob out of his own free will. Jacob even makes sure that it’s Ben’s choice. Something that can’t be said of Sayid’s attempt to stab Fake-Locke in this episode. But we’ll get to that later.

Free will is the key, getting humans (and especially the candidates) to deviate and pick one side or the other.

Anyway, continuing with the episode.

Dogan realised that Sayid, a candidate, was straying towards the negative (because of some kind of influence, but more probably because of his obscure resurrection). He decides that Sayid should be eliminated instead of risking… something, something he might do? Something he might not do?

This is the second time Dogan tries to kill Sayid, but this time it’s a bit more direct. He doesn’t go through with it because he has a moment of clarity. He sees the baseball and decides to spare Sayid. Now, we have to wonder if this is because he remembers what the baseball means to him, or because he knows what will happen if he (directly) kills Sayid. We’ll touch on that some more later.

This next scene is also fascinating. Fake-Locke and Claire are standing at the edge of the ash ring (which we know keeps smokey at bay), he’s telling her to go inside. She asks why he can’t do it and he explains that he can’t. Why not? Why not ask Claire to kick the ashes away? There’s more to it than that. She says “If i go in there, i need to know that you’ll do what you said, i want my son back”. He replies “i always do what i say”, and i believe him. I believe he intends to get Aaron (wonder why she didn’t refer to him by name…) back to her. Perhaps Aaron IS this “Wallace” that’s coming to the island? The fathers name could well be Wallace.

I really got the feeling from Fake-Locke here that he doesn’t particularly want to go in there and hurt people, he just accepts that it has to happen. I think his intention is to collect followers, not punish innocents.

I love Sayid’s utter confusion at being exiled, then finding out that he wasn’t even resurrected by the temple others. He has no idea what’s going on. Nor do we Sayid, nor do we.

Dogan and Claires exchange reveals that Dogan would be killed if he left the temple. Claire suggests that he sends someone that “you know who” won’t kill. Dogan immediately wants to send Hurley or Jack, but upon discovering they’re no longer in the temple – decides to send Sayid. I don’t think this is primarily an attempt to get Sayid killed. Why give him the old dagger? Which, by the way, looks to be a Roman Pugio (so we’re talking 1st Centure AD). Trust me, this dagger is relevant. I think he’s sending Sayid because, resurrected or not, Sayid is a candidate. He knows that Fake-Locke can’t kill candidates.

Thing is, it’s not Sayid’s free choice to kill him. Dogan has convinced him to do it. I don’t think this is going to do it.

Having difficulty finding anything to comment on in the Sayid flash-sideways. It’s interesting, and entertaining, but so far they’re not adding anything to the plot.

Back on the island Sayid bumps into Kate, who appears to be going back into the temple. Didn’t she say that she wasn’t going to the temple? I loved Miles explaining that he wanted to go after Sawyer. Reminding us that they were close. Spent three years together and apparently did become good friends. I enjoyed their dynamic even though we didn’t see much of it – he probably ended up being closer to Sawyer than any of our original Losties did, even Kate.

So, Sayid does as instructed and stabs Fake-Locke (after he’s spoken, which according to Dogan is too late). Love, love, love Terry O’Quinn as Fake-Locke. He’s so convincing.

Fake-Locke is a manipulator. I don’t believe him when he says that Dogan sent Sayid to his death. But i said that already. I believe that because Sayid is already inclined towards the evil side of things, he’s very easy for Fake-Locke to manipulate. It’s not that i believe Fake-Locke is actually especially evil (which is where things get complicated), but for the simple reason that someone who is off balance, is always easier to push over. If you get my meaning.

Sayid is no fool. He knows Fake-Locke is trying to talk him into something, but what he wasn’t prepared for is the offer. Anything he wanted. A go at the magic box that gives you whatever you want. Fake-Locke offers him the chance to see Nadia again, and it’s pretty obvious that Sayid is going to take him up on that. What does he have to lose? He already believes that he’s evil, he told us that at the end of season five! Dogan just pushed him over the edge.

So, Fake-Locke is saying that he can give Sayid the thing he wishes for most – Nadia, and of course we cut straight to the flash-sideways where he does indeed see Nadia. It’s almost like the flash-sideways were created by one of those evil movie genies, giving you what you asked for, but not in the way you wanted. You can see Nadia again, but she’s married to your brother. Oooh, nasty.

Sayid tells the temple others that there’s a man in the jungle. Again they’re telling us that Fake-Locke IS a man. He also says something very interesting. Jacob is dead now, and the temple others don’t have to stay there any more. He said the same thing to Bram etc in the statue foot. Is he just suggesting that their responsibilities have ended, or is it more sinister – like they were being held “captive” in the temple. Enthralled, indentured, whatever. He tells them that if they leave the temple they can join “the man” and leave the island, but if they don’t leave they’ll be killed. Dogan looks like he’s fairly sure things are not going to go his way.

Kate and Claire, we were sitting watching this scene going “nooooo”, Emilie de Ravin does a VERY good job of being evil. That facial expression is terrifying. Kate refers to “raising” Aaron. Reminding us of Claire being told that no one else could “raise” Aaron, “raised by another” etc. Sounds bad. We know that Claire said she’d kill Kate if this was true.

Loved seeing Omar and Keamey in the flash-sideways. But i love seeing Kevin Durand in things, seemed like a really decent guy when i was doing Robin Hood, huge in real life too – and i’m 6′2. But back to Lost. Interesting to see them back in the flash-sideways. Don’t know if this is just fan service, or if there’s a decent reason for it. No idea why they’re doing organised crime now instead of being mercenaries. Just another Lost co-incidence. But as much of a co-incidence as finding Jin. Whaaaat? Did Jin deliver the watch to them? Did they ambush him? Were they working for one of Jin’s company’s competitors who didn’t want Jin “sealing the deal” with the gift?

Okay, so, i’m eating humble pie. I would’ve bet a lot of money that Dogan was a WWII officer. But he worked in a bank. Could i have been more wrong? He explains that he drank too much, and got into an accident (another car accident?) with his son – who was very badly injured. Someone comes to him and offers him a deal – i’ll save your son, but you can never see him again, in exchange you’ll come to the island and get a new job. This is a very selfless act, perhaps something that would tip your “scale” over into the positive. We find out in a few moments that it was Dogan keeping Fake-Locke out, perhaps Dogan being very far over on the positive side of things kept Fake-Locke at bay, perhaps this is why he didn’t kill Sayid when he had the chance. Perhaps seeing the baseball reminded him of the sacrifice he made, and that he couldn’t risk his alignment by killing Sayid.

Dogan realises that Sayid has made a similar deal with Fake-Locke. It’s worth noting that although he says that the man who visited him with his son was Jacob, we don’t know for sure that it was the Jacob we know. It could have been the man in black. Infact, the man in black could even be called Jacob, he could be Jacobs servant (remember the image we saw on a wall? the smoke and the egyptian god?) – or perhaps the man in black could even BE Jacob, a la Fight Club.

I have to wonder why Sayid throws Dogan in the water. He’s fought Dogan before and lost, why risk a physical struggle with him when you’ve got a big knife? Perhaps he was told to kill Dogan with the water. Perhaps Dogan will come back to life because of it, and the dark water will bring him back wrong, a la Sayid? There’s MUCH more to be revealed about that water, and water in general.

I was sure that Miles would die, i’m glad he didn’t, i like Miles. I also like Frank and Ben, and they’re both acting like they know a lot more now about what’s going on. Maybe Illana filled them in a little during the walk over? Interesting that Illana referred to Ben as Linus. They love surnames. She knows about candidates. She knows his name is crossed off.

Love this scene with Ben and Sayid. I’ve been a big fan of Ben since we first met him – i used to enthuse “he’s the good guy, you’ll see” and i still think we’ll see him do something amazing before the end of the series. I like that he’s genuinely trying to save Sayid here, and it makes me more sure that Illana must have explained what’s going on. He’s really trying to help Sayid, but then when he sees Sayid’s reaction he backs off in fear. He knows Sayid has shifted, gone wrong. But i’m not sure if this is some kind of “claiming” like Dogan said, or if Sayid has just accepted his fate.

Hated the eerie “catch a falling star” playing while Sayid, Clair and Kate walked through the temple. Why is it playing? Is it Claire’s voice? Why did Smokey let Kate survive it?

My real question is why did all the temple others decide to follow Locke? Is it fear? Respect? Or does this go back to what i said before about the non-candidates being easily swayed? I talked before about whats-her-name the air hostess acting like she was never really a normal off-island person.

Fake-Locke’s staring at Kate when she walks out is interesting. Like he’s trying to gauge what she’ll do. Whether she’s one of “them” or not. Remember, her name WAS on the wheel.

Couldn’t help wondering where Sawyer was in this scene. With Jin?

Good episode.

Tags: ,

Lost 6 ep4 – The Substitute

Half way through “The Substitute” I knew I wasn’t paying enough attention to the episode. It’s not that I was paying less attention than usual, simply that you can’t really do this episode justice without sitting there taking notes – they just gave us so much to think about.

I went into this episode with a couple of thoughts. I was pretty sure it’d be Locke centric, the preview showed a conversation between Locke and Randy Nations, if memory serves. I also knew the title – “The Substitute”. This made me think about the conversation between Eloise Hawking and Jack in the Lamp Post station. She explained to Jack that they needed to take Locke’s body with them, as a “proxy” for Christian’s body. “Proxy” and “substitute” – it wasn’t too big a leap of faith to assume that the episode would tackle something to do with Locke’s body on the Ajira flight. That was about as far as my thoughts for this episode went.

We spend a good amount of this episode accompanying divergent timeline Locke. We see his suburban home – living the “American Dream” by the look of it.

This leads me to something I personally thought was very interesting. Stubborn as always, Locke tries to wheelie off his broken wheelchair lift, instead of calling for help. Not sure I blame him personally. He ends up sprawled on the grass, his wheelchair folded beside him to add insult to injury. His body language says “well that sucked, but I will persevere” and then the sprinklers click on. I swear his reaction here is one of good humour. He seems to be laughing at the situation! Especially while talking to Helen (nice to see her alive!). Other people have mentioned to me that he seems upset, hurt, but I really didn’t see it that way. To see him finding amusement in the situation made me think that this is a happier Locke, a Locke that is less angry at his situation. Less stubborn, but still trying to look after himself.

We find out that John and Helen are getting married, and appear to be very much in love. Helens comments about “destiny” are very reflective of the Locke we know. What ARE the chances of him running into a spinal surgeon? Well, fairly good in Lost!

She mentions his father here, this is a funny little rabbithole to climb down. If he and his father are on good terms, then perhaps his father isn’t a con man, perhaps he never got pushed out of the window. So why’s he in a wheelchair, and are Sawyers parents still alive?

We see Smokey zooming around the island, appearing to manifest himself as Locke to pick up a machete and cut Richard down. Richard is quite the contrast to Ben, looking quite surprised at his hurt, abused state. We’re used to seeing a bloodied up Ben Linus. But Richard is usually looking handsome and well dressed. Does this count as proof that Locke is definitely inhabited by Smokey? I’d say so, we’re not going to see CGI morphing between Locke and Smokey anytime soon.

Turns out that the divergent timeline hasn’t done anything to make Randy Nations any less of a “douche”. He comments on Locke’s Australia-tan and tortures him for a while instead of straight out asking where Locke was. Thing is, I would’ve liked an answer to this question myself. In our timeline Locke was turned away, but the walkabout company bought him an early flight home. But in this timeline things seem a bit different. Locke says “why don’t we just call it my vacation week” – inferring he was away for a week. If he intended to go on walkabout it’s safe to say that he went to the tour company as soon as he arrived in Australia. Assuming they turned him away then, he’d still have the rest of the week to kill. Randy comments on his tan – I doubt you’d be getting much of a tan if you few straight back home, and I doubt he’d have been sitting at home all that time. So did this Locke stay in Australia? If i’m right about this version of Locke being less stubborn he may well not have got quite as angry in the tour place, and may not have been bought an early flight home. So I say again, what did he do with the week? Why didn’t he just go to the conference? Maybe he went to see Isaac the healer.

“Richard, I’m sorry I hit you in the throat and dragged you off the beach”. Now there’s a hell of a line. The dialogue between Richard and “Locke” was very interesting. Let me break something down.. Richard told actual-Locke that he had to die. He told him this because fake-Locke told him to say it. So does that mean that fake-Locke manipulated Ben into killing Locke (a candidate) so he could take on Locke’s body and use it to manipulate Richard into letting he and Ben near Jacob and manipulate Ben into killing Jacob? If this is the case then MY GOD fake-locke has game.

Add Richard to the list of people who seem to know who fake-Locke actually is, a list which does not include us. People think that fake-Locke is the Man In Black, and also Smokey. I think the latter is definitely true, and the former is probably true – but till we find out for sure I’m not placing money on anything. Richard and fake-Locke have a history, seems that fake-Locke has tried to recruit him before! He plays the “Jacob didn’t tell you anything” card, I guess now Richard knows what Ben was going through.

Then the boy appears. The sound you can hear at this point is thousands of people rewinding their Tivos. What’s with the Jesus stance and the bloody hands? Why does fake-Locke look so disturbed by this? Isn’t he supposed to know what’s happening?! I mean, sure, you see a kid standing in a beam of light with bloody hands, you’re going to be taken aback – but if you happen to be a dude who can turn into smoke, shouldn’t you be a bit less shocked?

The kid’s gone before Richard see’s him, but I doubt Richard would’ve had a clue anyway. I’m not sure if the kid turning up is why fake-Locke decides to let Richard go, or if he was going to do that anyway.

Illana knows what’s going on. I bet. She’s got a close relationship to Jacob, we’ve seen him come to her and ask for help. I think she leads this… “force” that were trying to protect him. She takes his ashes, we know ashes have significance. Maybe she’s going to try to bring him back, or maybe she’s going to use them against Jacob’s enemy.

If I was fake-Locke, and I was recruiting, I think I’d go for Sawyer first. “This isn’t your house… You just lived here for a while”. Reminds me of divergent timeline Locke’s conversation with divergent timeline Jack about his fathers body not being his father. His reaction to Sawyers accusation of “not being Locke” was interesting too. He doesn’t say he’s not Locke, perhaps because Locke IS still part of him?

Nice to see that Hurley still has his yellow Hummer. Also nice that he’s lucky enough not to get it scratched by Locke’s lift. I love happy Hugo. Then again I think he’s fantastic in every part of this show, and I’m sure he’s the key to the whole mystery. The way he interacts with John here is almost on par with Jacob visiting the candidates.

Illana points out that she knows who Jin is. How does she know that? Maybe Ben told her, maybe Jacob told her, maybe she’s researched all the “candidates”. Burying Locke is a good idea. But I’ve talked about burying too many times.

The kid appears again, great, as if we haven’t been creeped out enough already! fake-Locke is surprised that Sawyer can see him. Lets talk about that. Hurley can see people that other people can’t. They’re either in his imagination, or they’re dead. Perhaps this is also true here. fake-Locke assumes this boy is a manifestation of the dead, but as soon as he finds out that Sawyer can see him he realises the kid is real – hence the chase.

“You know the rules, you can’t kill him”. Seems obvious that he’s talking about Sawyer here. Sawyer is a candidate, you can’t kill candidates. As I mentioned previously it seems that fake-Locke had to work pretty hard to get Ben to kill Locke (a candidate) so perhaps the kid is just reminding fake-Locke that he can’t simply do away with Sawyer himself.

I want to talk about something here, a series of books close to my heart. Written by a Russian author called Sergei Lukyanenko they follow the struggle between two sides – light and dark, who have sworn to uphold a balance between them. The members of these two sides are abnormal humans with certain abilities. Whenever a new person of this kind is “tapped” he is unaligned, somewhere between the two sides. Neither side is allowed to directly force the person to join, but instead can try to guide them to find their own path – select their own side.

This scene reminded me of the books. We’re talking about two sides, who have rules, and are portrayed as light and dark. Perhaps Jacob and Man In Black have spent all this time maintaining balance, influencing people to join their respective sides. Jacob kept bringing people to the island to try to tip the balance into his favour, but Man In Black thought the whole thing was a waste of time. He’s sick of it, he just wants to end it all. He’s playing dirty now, killing people. Perhaps this kid is just reminding fake-Locke that, if he wants to do something, the most he can do is influence Sawyer, not just kill him. Or maybe not.

A great moment here is fake-Locke screaming John-Locke’s catchphrase. “Don’t tell me what I can’t do”. Is some of Locke still in there? Perhaps fake-Locke just has enough of John’s personality and memory absorbed that it felt like the right thing to say.

Rose gives a little speech about getting over her cancer depression. Living her life. Didn’t she just get back from seeing the Australian healer? Probably not!

I like hearing fake-Locke say that he used to be a man. I believe this. But I’m not sure if he’s talking about Locke’s experience, or from his own. Either could be the case.

Mr Eko’s church appeared again. I miss Eko. How would things be different if he was still in the show? I’m sure they had big plans for him.

I think Ben is telling the truth when he says he thinks Locke was a better man than him, and that he’s sorry for the murder. I do honestly believe he means it.

John talks about there being no such thing as a miracle. Maybe my previous idea about the faith healer wasn’t so far off the mark. Maybe he went to see the healer and had a bad experience.

I’m not sure about this scene with fake-Locke and Sawyer on the ladders. If fake-Locke wanted Sawyer dead he could have just let him fall. Maybe he IS recruiting, or tying to influence Sawyer. The white and black stones on the scales are fun. I don’t understand using the ceiling as a place to write.. But then again, I have enough time getting cogent thoughts down on a piece of paper.

John as a substitute teacher, delightful. Ben as a teacher, wondrous. This moment really bothered me though. Seeing Johns face when he refers to himself as a “substitute”, and the cut straight to fake-Locke’s smug face. Uh oh.

Jacob had a “thing for numbers” but apparently not for names – Shepherd’s name on the wall. But doesn’t specifically say “Jack”. Same with “Kwon”. He does imply that it DOES mean Jack, but didn’t Mr Friendly say that Jack wasn’t on Jacob’s list? fake-Locke points out that Jacob really did manipulate all of the candidates, manipulated them on key points in their lives. We all assumed this, and apparently it was true.

Sawyer listens to fake-Locke suggest that Jacob manipulated him, pushed him to the island, but seems happy to accept fake-Lockes suggestion that they leave – without worry. Silly.

Tags: ,

Lost s6 ep 3 – What Kate Does

It’s taken me a while to get round to writing this. Kept putting it off until I re-watched the episode, which never happened (until now). I didn’t listen to any podcasts (really missed listening to The Transmission!), or post on any blogs.

I’m not going to say that What Kate Does was a bad episode. I’m certainly not going to say the word “filler”. I’m sure other people will point that finger, but it’s too late in the game for the writers to be throwing filler content together. This is a significant episode. Significant because the whole point of Lost is the character progression. There are a few answers in this episode too – though they probably won’t occur to us until we appreciate the connected questions.

It’s a Kate episode, and they never sit well with the fans. I’m not sure what I think of her – she’s a useful literary vehicle, if a bit of a one-trick-pony. She’s got tracking skills whenever we don’t have Locke around to make use of his. She’s a potential love interest to our two strong male characters. She causes contention with strong female characters. Like I said, she’s a useful tool.

But we never really engage with her story, we’ve had heart wrenching moments. Horrible insinuations about her past. Emotional turmoil, guilt, romance, all of those things – and we still don’t really like her, who knows why. Regardless, her story is important – and this episode tells us more of it.

Another important point is that this episode gives us some more Claire content. Something people were desperate to see. I think once we have a bit more information about whether or not the divergent timeline (see my previous entry for my opinions) will connect in any way to “our” losties – then people may care more about the “landies” (I just made that up). But people wanted Claire, and they’re giving us Claire. We also got a bit of fan-service in this episode, seeing Doc Arzt freaking out in front of the taxi.

“What’s up with Sayid’s resurrection” is the question on everyone’s lips, I’m sure. Certainly seems to be the question Dogan wants answers to. With his “tests”. Blowing powder over Sayid’s belly (or ashes, perhaps). Little bit of Rousseau-esque torture – as if Sayid hasn’t been tortured enough. Dogan seems convinced that whatever has happened to Sayid is baaad. He tells us that Sayid has been claimed – very congruent with my previous comments regarding the French team.

I think “claiming” is what happens to dead bodies. This is an entirely separate process to “appearing as someone else” (Fake-Locke, for example). Claimed people are actual bodies – reanimated. This is why bodies have to be buried on the island. Rousseau’s people were claimed, this is why they went wrong and why they left dead bodies when she shot them. I think Jacks father has been claimed (hence his body never turning up), and *drumroll* I think Claire was claimed after she died in the house explosion (seemed a little too convenient that she survived that.. didn’t it?). Part of me believes that “claiming” is souls of island inhabitants taking over dead bodies, and this is why babies die on the island – souls trying to inhabit bodies that aren’t ready for them. Like I said though, only part of me believes that.

Dogan wants Sayid dead, either because he doesn’t want the “infection” to spread, or because he doesn’t want an enemy in his camp. It may be too late in the “game” to take risks. He can’t afford to let Jack die, because Jack is on the list.

A few thoughts:

Aldo – They went to a lot of effort to make us dislike this guy, and get excited when he died.

Justin – I like Justin, his little puppy-dog expressions every time Aldo shot him down. Another character who could’ve really cleared up some things for us if they hadn’t killed him off.

Kate’s Taxi – Uhh, hasn’t she been on the run long enough to realise that she should be changing vehicles if the police are hot on her trail?

Sayid the zombie – An obvious shout out to the official lost podcast.

Claires birthing – Kate presence helps solidify the idea that a lot of things are still working the way they’re “supposed to”. He’s called “aaron” again. Of course! It’s a good name! It’s MY name.

Doctor Goodspeed – Fascinating! But not surprising. He was Goodspeed before he was “Rom”. There’s a good chance that he was taken off the island in the 70’s timeline, but brought back after the Swan was built. Then kidnapped by the others and turned into Ethan Rom. So in the divergent timeline, he couldn’t go back because the island sank. So now he’s here, doing what he does. Good on him, I was never comfortable with his death.

Sawyers ring – Amazing acting by Josh. Love the character development here, he really was in love with Juliet. I’m hoping for a divergent timeline reunion.

Dogan’s baseball – Interesting. This was a very intentional moment. Initially I thought Dogan to be a “samurai” type character, on the island for a long time, blah blah. Now i’m thinking he’s a WWII Officer. Baseball and typewriter would be the right era for him (perhaps someone gave him the baseball, someone he valued – even an enemy). He could well dislike English because he was fighting a war against the west. He’s obviously an experienced leader of men. So yeah, my shout is WWII Officer.

Dogan and Claire – He explains that the claiming has already happened to Jack’s sister (Claire). How does he know? Does Jacks Father (or whatever is inhabiting his body) visit the temple, did he bring Claire?

Feral Claire – They made a point of comparing the traps to Rousseau, but that she had been dead “for years”. going back to the soul-occupancy point from earlier – could Rousseau have taken over her body? Hmm. Not sure about that.

Anyway, a good episode – better on the rewatch than it was originally, like so many Lost episodes. Looking forward to seeing the next episode tonight!

Tags: ,

Lost s6 eps 1 and 2 – LA X

It’s been a long time since i’ve blogged anything, so i’ve decided to write a few entries summing up my thoughts on episodes of the new season of Lost.

Watching Lost is a wonderful experience, and although the mysteries, mythology and relationships aren’t for everyone – it’s worth seeing just to experience the incredible storytelling.

Anyway, seeing as i’ll be watching episode 3 tonight, i thought i’d just copy and paste my “brain dump” for episodes 1 and 2. I’ll write a detailed post about episode 3 after i’ve watched it.

That ep gave us a lot to think about, quite a lot of curtain drawing back, but not much Wizard of Oz behind it.

The first big reveal is that there’s a new timeline in which 815 doesn’t crash, and obviously events differ as soon as it passes the “crash moment”. But there are a couple of noticeable differences that set it apart from OUR 815.

The first being the fact that Desmond is on the plane.

The second, unless i’m going insane, is that Hurley is happy and believes himself to be the luckiest man in the world. I’m pretty sure he’s just coming back from being knocked back by the wife of the guy who gave him the numbers. Not giving him the sympathetic ear, the understand, that we know he wanted. Plus, I’m guessing someone who says that nothing ever bad happens to them wouldn’t have that mindset if their mansion had burned down, or their chicken franchise had been hit by a meteor. So I’m guessing those things haven’t happened in this timeline. But it’s understandable that things relating to the numbers might change if the timeline has changed.. We’ll get to that later.

Anyway, the next reveal we have is that in the divergent timeline we see that the island is underwater, which would’ve really got the Atlantis-theorists going giddy if it wasn’t for the inclusion of the Dharma huts, and the Dharma branded shark. Which means that the island submerged at some point after the 70’s, fairly congruent with the idea of a hydrogen bomb going off in 70’s…

Then we see that OUR losties are still on the island, but have moved back to the “present”. The hatch is back, albeit destroyed.

We get Sawyers “IT HASNT WORKED” hissyfit, then Juliets posthumous “oh but it has” rebuttal.

In my opinion, she’s right:

The point of the hydrogen bomb was to disperse the electromagnetic energy and change the past in such a way that it couldn’t course correct. If the electromagnetic energy is dispersed, the hatch doesn’t need to be built, Desmond can’t be there pushing the button, so he won’t fail, and 815 won’t crash.

They’ve basically committed a grandfather paradox by going back in time and stopping themselves crashing.

Grandfather paradoxes are exactly that, paradoxes, they can’t exist in a simple way, you can’t go back and change your own past.

So how does the universe cope with the idea that the person who’s changing reality won’t exist?

It forks.

So the losties HAVE to still exist, in their own timeline, because otherwise our new losties couldn’t land at LAX.

I still don’t really know why the island would end up underwater, but maybe that’s just what would happen after a subterranean h-bomb detonation.

Okay, to progress:

Hurley DOES see dead people, fair enough, no idea why, but we also have no idea why miles can hear them, it’s just something that seems to have happened.

One of my theories is solidified, you see Montands body in the temple, but not the bodies of the other French people. I was initially convinced they were dead and possessed, but that was before we learned that smokey doesn’t need to possess the corpses, he just takes their visage.

So, if he had been doing that, they wouldn’t have had bodies when Danielle killed them. So perhaps they WERE still humans, just… converted somehow. There seems to be some “truth” that converts/recruits people to the cause, we meet the stewardess from the plane again in the temple. She doesn’t seem bothered at all by Jack and co turning up, she acts as if they’re from another life or something: “oh, they were on the plane with me”, as if she doesn’t think of herself as one of them anymore (which she may not be).

The whole water resurrection thing I can’t interpret yet, the “water of life”, “fountain of youth” idea has been floated before, to explain Richards immortality, but i’m not sure what i think about that.

I imagine that Sayid coming back to life of his own accord is either because of “course correction” or (my preferred explanation) because of Jacob touching him in the past. We’ve been shown Jacob touching certain people in their past, and we were shown a scene that very much appeared to be Jacob resurrecting Locke (after being thrown out of a building) by touching him on the shoulder.

We’ve also, going way back to the beginning, seen proof that fake-locke IS Smokey – “i’m sorry you had to see me like that”. We’ve also seen proof that the ashes protect against smokey (so the cabin encirclement was either to keep him out, or keep him in). We’ve seen that smokey killed those people without judging them – his normal modus operandi. Perhaps because they were “soldiers” or followers of jacob, he didn’t need to judge their free will. We also saw that shooting him didn’t seem to have an effect, he was fine when he reappeared, so we need to wonder here why jacob died. Was it because he was killed by someone who did so out of pure free will (Ben), or was it because he was in his original body? I don’t really believe the latter.

Okay, to proceed. His exchange with Richard is FASCINATING. “Nice to see you out of those chains”. My original Richard theory, way back, was that he was a slave from Egypt, being carried on the Black Rock. Richard being “in chains” is fairly congruent with that notion. I’m not talking ancient Egypt, just that Egypt was (if i understand correctly) used a lot in the slave trade, and he particularly looks like he could pass for Egyptian in a pinch.

We know that the man in black was wandering around when the Black Rock arrived, so if the last time he saw Richard was when Richard was in chains, it must’ve been after that point. So I assume richard was on that ship. But after that, some event must have occurred that either took the man in black out of the loop (imprisoning him perhaps), or forcing him to remain in smoke form (where he can’t exactly interact with people).

Either way, this is the first conversation he’s had with Richard in a long time (at least 50 years), which is troubling. Richard hasn’t been hiding, and we know the smoke monster was wandering around in the 70s. Like i said, troubling.

We also get to see that there’s definitely a conflict of sorts between the temple-others, and the man in black. They have counter measures (the firework alert, and the ashes) ready to go. So why does Jacobs death suddenly mean that they’re a target? Was Jacob protecting them? hiding them? Or did the RULES of the conflict forbid the man in black from hurting Jacobs followers. Rules which are made irrelevant after jacob dies. We know that the others made a truce with Dharma, perhaps that isn’t the first truce they’ve been involved in…

I think I’ve covered everything save for the events in the divergent timeline – which i don’t think are important yet.

I also haven’t mentioned my utter frustration at Sawyer for not taking Juliets body to the temple.

Tags:

Changed my desk again



Re-Jigged my desk again.. I like it more than the last two attempts.
Macbook pro on the left, can’t close the screen at the moment for a reason i’ll explain in a later post. It’s driving the 24-inch dell in the middle.
On the right is a 19-or-20-inch Dell LCD driven by the dual xeon linux workstation under my desk. It’s running ubuntu at a pitiful resolution at the moment because i can’t find a PCI-E 8x graphics card. Stupid diminutive slots.
In the lower left is my new MSI Wind, which i should post a review of at some point. It’s running Windows XP because i know the wifi card is troublesome in both Linux and OSX – i need wifi working when i’m in Berlin, so i’ll tinker with it after i’m back.

Tags: , , , ,

Tidying

I’ve spent the last little while trying to sort out my shelves. It’s not going so well.
This is how they looked before i started:


Click the image to view the photo notes in flickr.

Tags: , , ,

Summer holidays

Planning… Something i’m hideously bad at, except in the kitchen. I always find it easier to just buy stuff that’ll help me plan, than to actually DO the planning.



But hopefully these will help!

Tags: , ,

Obsessed

You know you’re obsessed with video game bosses when this happens:





becomes…


Tags: